NEED MORE4 centers voted yes for representation and are in the process of negotiating...
EPH - East Philadelphia, Pa
SBR - S. Brunswick, NJ
CLT - Charlotte, NC
STK - Stockton, Ca
NEED MORE4 centers voted yes for representation and are in the process of negotiating...
EPH - East Philadelphia, Pa
SBR - S. Brunswick, NJ
CLT - Charlotte, NC
STK - Stockton, Ca
If anyone thought that the company wouldn't draw it out you're in a dream worldblame the company for dragging the contract neg. out
Getting back ON TOPIC. I think the following applies, specifically to the topic at hand.
Perhaps someone local might like to provide the details?
https://www.nlrb.gov/case/10-CA-192054
FedEx Freight, Inc.
Case Number: 10-CA-192054
Location: Charlotte, NC
Date Filed: 01/27/2017
Region Assigned: Region 10, Atlanta, Georgia
Status: Open
Docket Activity
Date Document Issued/Filed By
01/30/2017 Initial Letter to Charging Party* NLRB - GC
01/30/2017 Initial Letter to Charged Party* NLRB - GC
01/30/2017 Signed Charge Against Employer* Charging Party
01/27/2017 Signed Charge Against Employer* Charging Party
The Docket Activity list does not reflect all actions in this case.
* This document may require redactions before it can be viewed. To obtain a copy, please file a request through our FOIA Branch.
Allegations
- 8(a)(5) Repudiation/Modification of Contract [Sec 8(d)/Unilateral Changes]
- 8(a)(3) Changes in Terms and Conditions of Employment
- 8(a)(5) Refusal to Bargain/Bad Faith Bargaining (incl'g surface bargaining/direct dealing)
Undoubtedly Red knows something, but I think he decided he was done with this thread lest he land himself in trouble.Getting back ON TOPIC. I think the following applies, specifically to the topic at hand.
Perhaps someone local might like to provide the details?
https://www.nlrb.gov/case/10-CA-192054
FedEx Freight, Inc.
Case Number: 10-CA-192054
Location: Charlotte, NC
Date Filed: 01/27/2017
Region Assigned: Region 10, Atlanta, Georgia
Status: Open
Docket Activity
Date Document Issued/Filed By
01/30/2017 Initial Letter to Charging Party* NLRB - GC
01/30/2017 Initial Letter to Charged Party* NLRB - GC
01/30/2017 Signed Charge Against Employer* Charging Party
01/27/2017 Signed Charge Against Employer* Charging Party
The Docket Activity list does not reflect all actions in this case.
* This document may require redactions before it can be viewed. To obtain a copy, please file a request through our FOIA Branch.
Allegations
- 8(a)(5) Repudiation/Modification of Contract [Sec 8(d)/Unilateral Changes]
- 8(a)(3) Changes in Terms and Conditions of Employment
- 8(a)(5) Refusal to Bargain/Bad Faith Bargaining (incl'g surface bargaining/direct dealing)
Undoubtedly Red knows something, but I think he decided he was done with this thread lest he land himself in trouble.
All I will say on the subject is that it shouldn't come as a surprise that a complaint was filed.
Wasn't complaining, my friend. Merely making an observation. Had I been complaining directly about the content of your post, I assure you that I would have been less vague about it.With all due respect, will you also withdraw your complaint, when it turns out that the above case is directly related to the original post and topic?
....Undoubtedly Red knows something....
Understood. You know I'm generally reluctant to post without absolute proof. That is why the hope for local clarification.Wasn't complaining, my friend. Merely making an observation. Had I been complaining directly about the content of your post, I assure you that I would have been less vague about it.
My only goal here is to prevent another devolution where people start taking shots at one another over their views on the subject matter. I want a proper discussion as much as anyone else, the topical issue is merely what Smokestack has set as his yardstick.
If what you've posted is related, there's no concerns. That said, I can't help but notice that you are posting on a presumption, without presentation of why this is related. I'm waiting to see before judging myself.
My mention of a complaint was merely referring to the case itself.
And then there is this case, from E. Philadelphia, PA. It seems to be more narrowly focused on the topic of vacation benefits.Regardless of the context of the ULP, I for one am glad it was brought to everyone's attention. I feel it is a valuable update on the goings-on of the Union Centers.
And then there is this case, from E. Philadelphia, PA. It seems to be more narrowly focused on the topic of vacation benefits.
https://www.nlrb.gov/case/04-CA-192059
The NLRB has issued a dismissal letter on this case, thus siding with the company and finding the ULP filed by Local 71 to be invalid...Getting back ON TOPIC. I think the following applies, specifically to the topic at hand.
Perhaps someone local might like to provide the details?
https://www.nlrb.gov/case/10-CA-192054
FedEx Freight, Inc.
Case Number: 10-CA-192054
Location: Charlotte, NC
Date Filed: 01/27/2017
Region Assigned: Region 10, Atlanta, Georgia
Status: Open
Docket Activity
Date Document Issued/Filed By
01/30/2017 Initial Letter to Charging Party* NLRB - GC
01/30/2017 Initial Letter to Charged Party* NLRB - GC
01/30/2017 Signed Charge Against Employer* Charging Party
01/27/2017 Signed Charge Against Employer* Charging Party
The Docket Activity list does not reflect all actions in this case.
* This document may require redactions before it can be viewed. To obtain a copy, please file a request through our FOIA Branch.
Allegations
- 8(a)(5) Repudiation/Modification of Contract [Sec 8(d)/Unilateral Changes]
- 8(a)(3) Changes in Terms and Conditions of Employment
- 8(a)(5) Refusal to Bargain/Bad Faith Bargaining (incl'g surface bargaining/direct dealing)
Yep, and the ULP filed against EPH was dismissed as well....Yeah I had a friend tell me earlier they had filed one too.
No, I knew it was just a frivolous ULP.You thought it would be different. They think they are union but no contract. No one to bargain with. You can't force FedEx to the table. All these terminals that went union won't get anything. People tried to tell them but they believed the union.
You thought it would be different. They think they are union but no contract. No one to bargain with. You can't force FedEx to the table. All these terminals that went union won't get anything. People tried to tell them but they believed the union.
Yes, people did try to tell them but they chose to drink the union kool-aid and buy into their propaganda.