You must call it a civil debate when you convince someone of coming around to your distorted, illusional and illogical points of views.
nounionfool said:Like I said numerous times, In my opinion, in that condescending, arrogant and egoistic, distorted, illusional and illogical mind of yours, if someone doesn't come around to your way of thinking, you consider it a fact that they are unreasonable, hellbent and incapable of holding a civil debate.
As far as I know SwampRatt is still very much pro bring the Teamsters to FedEx. We disagreed, very civil in our debates. No need to convince the other person to see things our way. We were reasonable, civil and persistent in our views and would consider the man a friend, though we've never met.
nonunionfool" said:Oh, and by the way, I see that you decided that your reply to our childish bickering was paramount. You made sure that reply got answered before those two replies waiting for you that actually dealt with the topic at hand. Now what does that say for your character?
Not every post that quotes me requires a response. Neither of those posts asked me a question. Neither of those posts contained anything that I disagreed with.