Ironically it's not the "union guys" holding XPO responsible it's the California court system.It does seem strange that the union guys are only holding XPO accountable. A contract takes two parties. Nobody was forced to sign it.
I'm not saying XPO did nothing wrong. All I'm saying is they weren't forced to take the job and have responsibility in it. I know in our current political atmosphere it's hard to imagine, but it's possible that both parties are wrong.Ironically it's not the "union guys" holding XPO responsible it's the California court system.
The courts disagree with you.I'm not saying XPO did nothing wrong. All I'm saying is they weren't forced to take the job and have responsibility in it. I know in our current political atmosphere it's hard to imagine, but it's possible that both parties are wrong.
The courts are saying the workers were forced to sign the contract?The courts disagree with you.
I think the courts ruled they are employees, not contractors.The courts are saying the workers were forced to sign the contract?
It was a US courtHow many times has the supreme court overturned the California courts?
Is it safe to assume that Stand4afuture and Sucker666 are taking a seat in this conversation since they refuse to answer my questions?It's like you and Sucker are reading the same book when it comes to avoiding my questions.......
I get it. You don't like greedy corporations. So how will inviting the union, a greedy corporation that wants to get rich on my back, help me? How is dealing with two greedy corporations, instead of one, better?
Whip it seems despite are private conversations here you are determined to publicly speak the opposite of are conversation. What is your is your real motivation here ?Is it safe to assume that Stand4afuture and Sucker666 are taking a seat in this conversation since they refuse to answer my questions?
Talking to guys that think the union is the bees knees, are like guys trying to get the hot girl to sleep with them. They'll say anything she wants to hear. The minute the girl calls the guys bluff, they get defiant and act like the girl did something wrong by calling him out.
So what's your solution to the problem ? You agree that we work for a greedy corporation and you claim all unions are the the same. What is your solution?Is it safe to assume that Stand4afuture and Sucker666 are taking a seat in this conversation since they refuse to answer my questions?
Talking to guys that think the union is the bees knees, are like guys trying to get the hot girl to sleep with them. They'll say anything she wants to hear. The minute the girl calls the guys bluff, they get defiant and act like the girl did something wrong by calling him out.
Neither of you have answered my question. What assumptions am I making?You make a lot of assumptions mr whip despite our private conversation.
Unlike you, I haven't contradicted myself. Like I said in the private conversation, it's hard to have a debate when certain parties can't and won't answer questions so they claim my post are pointless.Whip it seems despite are private conversations here you are determined to publicly speak the opposite of are conversation. What is your is your real motivation here ?
Priceless.So what's your solution to the problem ? You agree that we work for a greedy corporation and you claim all unions are the the same. What is your solution?
That's a fair question, what's the solution?Priceless.
unless I missed it I did not see where he said thatYou agree that we work for a greedy corporation
Agreed. It is a fair question. I thought my questions were also fair, yet they go unanswered. Unanswered by quys that say the union is the answer. The cracks are starting to show in this old house.That's a fair question, what's the solution?