I’m just the opposite, city driver pulling sets daily....I might need the pay raise. I’ve been pulling long box after long box lately. They gouge you out of a penny.
I’m just the opposite, city driver pulling sets daily....I might need the pay raise. I’ve been pulling long box after long box lately. They gouge you out of a penny.
That was a daily occurrence for me. RARELY left the yard pulling a single. Triples were a weekly occurrence as well. One guy, three LTL trailers (one, usually a liftgate), and a 200-mile loop route daily! Ahhh....good times! In fact, I think I’ve talked myself into going back to work! (Cough)I’m just the opposite, city driver pulling sets daily....
Thank god triples are prohibited where I live....That was a daily occurrence for me. RARELY left the yard pulling a single. Triples were a weekly occurrence as well. One guy, three LTL trailers (one, usually a liftgate), and a 200-mile loop route daily! Ahhh....good times! In fact, I think I’ve talked myself into going back to work! (Cough)
That was a daily occurrence for me. RARELY left the yard pulling a single. Triples were a weekly occurrence as well. One guy, three LTL trailers (one, usually a liftgate), and a 200-mile loop route daily! Ahhh....good times! In fact, I think I’ve talked myself into going back to work! (Cough)
I don’t like it either. However this is ,without a doubt a “Change” in the conditions surrounding employment. There is no implied consent for your image or voice to be captured. As to Safety, the image or audible records have no Safety or preventative value. It does, however have the capability to defer or assign culpability for an incident or accident. The International should and will almost certainly address this issue promptly. (Hope I’m not too optimistic)If Safety was the primary objective, all units would be fitted with airbags (front and side impact) rather than concentrating on mitigating liability.I dont like this, but there isnt an a right to privacy when operating their equipment. no basis for greivance as well. this is a no win situation. it is also not a condition of employment. its a safety feature. the real test is when someone gets fired for wreck, etc,,or tampering..
The union already told the company that they do not accept the inward facing camera or any discipline that may follow after the company refused to sit down & discuss this issue....I don’t like it either. However this is ,without a doubt a “Change” in the conditions surrounding employment. There is no implied consent for your image or voice to be captured. As to Safety, the image or audible records have no Safety or preventative value. It does, however have the capability to defer or assign culpability for an incident or accident. The International should and will almost certainly address this issue promptly. (Hope I’m not too optimistic)If Safety was the primary objective, all units would be fitted with airbags (front and side impact) rather than concentrating on mitigating liability.
So....that ends it then? (I hope the glass is that half-full!) Thanks for the info I knew it would be discussed, I didn’t know it happened already.The union already told the company that they do not accept the inward facing camera or any discipline that may follow after the company refused to sit down & discuss this issue....
I’m sure there will be more discussion about it, the union is waiting until the yrc contract is settled....So....that ends it then? (I hope the glass is that half-full!) Thanks for the info I knew it would be discussed, I didn’t know it happened already.
Union and company are having a meeting on Wednesday April 24th
Which resort golf course will they be on?
A short 9-hole meeting,....or a full-blown 18-hole meeting?
Will the Private Chef be available mid-course to individually grill the Prime Ribs?
And.......Could there possibly be a.....video available for the rank-and-file to view?
Myrtle Beach, comes to mind!
You can bet the attorneys will accept the video after they issue a subpoena. Driver facing cameras only purpose is to find out if the driver has any blame in any incident. Be it 10% or 100%. They want to blame someone or not. Loyd's of London covers ABF after the first half a million. Maybe they are driving the issue. von.The union already told the company that they do not accept the inward facing camera or any discipline that may follow after the company refused to sit down & discuss this issue....
Just put tape over it. Problem solved.You can bet the attorneys will accept the video after they issue a subpoena. Driver facing cameras only purpose is to find out if the driver has any blame in any incident. Be it 10% or 100%. They want to blame someone or not. Loyd's of London covers ABF after the first half a million. Maybe they are driving the issue. von.
Just put tape over it. Problem solved.
I found a little lemon pledge on the head liner, always made the truck smell better(Just wink watch out for overspray)Ahh,....no. That's tampering.
But,.....I would highly recommend NOT cleaning the camera lens with any sticky, gummy solution,....which may degrade the quality of the video......
That's not tampering.....That's keeping your personal environment clean.......And we all like that.....