Serious question fellas. Do any of you know of anyone being suspended or terminated for multiple headway events?
I'm still trying to figure out how to play hide the pickle. Now I have to figure out what a headway event is?
It’s when you are getting in or out of the tractor too fast, hit your head on the top of the jam, and then let some choice words fly....I'm still trying to figure out how to play hide the pickle. Now I have to figure out what a headway event is?
Wouldn’t know that one. As soon as I detect a shifting of the Hat, I know to stop right there....It’s when you are getting in or out of the tractor too fast, hit your head on the top of the jam, and then let some choice words fly....
The camera is actually recording constantly. It emails the video in the scenario you mention. They can access the video at any time.Camera starts recording when you follow closer than 2 seconds for 3 mins at 55mph or faster. Heard a rumor a couple guys from STL had over a hundred “events” this year.
Was that you, Wong and Big R in that Jack in the Box pannido commercial? Those hats had to have shifted and no one was stopping.Wouldn’t know that one. As soon as I detect a shifting of the Hat, I know to stop right there....
Seriously? You MUST be joking...This :::: is flawed.
Like 1 second for 2.59 minutes is safer than 2 seconds at 3.01 minutes...
Should be tiered:
No more than 1 minute @ 1 second
No more than 5 minutes @ 2 seconds
etc
I for one, would think that a company is opening itself to a huge liability issue with the item in the video. If I were the owner, you couldn't run fast enough to give me that system.Seriously? You MUST be joking...
Dude, at 1 second (or even 2) you can't afford to look at anything but the tail lights of the vehicle in front. No mirrors, no gauges, nothing. Not to mention the public image factor. If that vehicle is a truck, good luck seeing anything of value.
How much sooner might you arrive, realistically, following at 1 or 2 seconds vs 5, 6 or 8?
Not even sure the newer trucks will let you follow at 1 second. I'm certainly NOT going to test it.
We'll stick with the "joking" explanation. Otherwise, you need the technology below to arrive ASAP, before something goes terribly wrong...
Agreed.Seriously? You MUST be joking...
Dude, at 1 second (or even 2) you can't afford to look at anything but the tail lights of the vehicle in front. No mirrors, no gauges, nothing. Not to mention the public image factor. If that vehicle is a truck, good luck seeing anything of value.
How much sooner might you arrive, realistically, following at 1 or 2 seconds vs 5, 6 or 8?
Not even sure the newer trucks will let you follow at 1 second. I'm certainly NOT going to test it.
We'll stick with the "joking" explanation. Otherwise, you need the technology below to arrive ASAP, before something goes terribly wrong...
Agreed.
Either way the grace period for recording should vary based on the severity of the following distance.
1 second following is more dangerous than 2 or 3 seconds so the company should incentivize quickly making more room than the standard grace period.
We're told that is exactly how it works. Trigger event gets viewed/reviewed. Only if something significant is detected will the driver (via Safety) be "coached". I'm told that if it makes it through all of that, it's pretty cut and dry, it's unsafe.I personally think the “powers that be” should proof the vids before calling a driver in to view....traveling 58 in a 65 zone at 1.9 secs for the entire 12 secs of the vid should not warrant being addressed IMO. It should be quite obvious from the vid that the driver is attempting to back off....