Conway pays for your DOT physical and if I remember right they give you $100.00 towards you fingerprinting.I do not know of any competitors that pay for their drivers fingerprints, or license. Medical exams, yes.
Conway pays for your DOT physical and if I remember right they give you $100.00 towards you fingerprinting.I do not know of any competitors that pay for their drivers fingerprints, or license. Medical exams, yes.
Correctomundo, Cayman man!!! If we were making money and not carrying the huge debt load, it would be something to negotiate in.If YRCF O/R were to dip below 90, an argument might be made for said reimbursement.
I have yet to use the Hazmat Endorsement in my personal life. I maintain it for the exclusive benefit of company I haul hazardous material for.
You take your physical on the clock? I'd like to hear more about this.pays me two hours, usually O/T, to take exam
The way it has always been.You take your physical on the clock? I'd like to hear more about this.
I never heard that one before, is that company wide or just for umm 'special' drivers?The way it has always been.
Jack Ching, badabing!
Holland was the first place I worked where I wasn't on the clock for a DOT physical.You take your physical on the clock? I'd like to hear more about this.
At Chicago Heights, YRCF and Roadway before that, time spent for DOT examinations is paid time. Article 51.Holland was the first place I worked where I wasn't on the clock for a DOT physical.
We have several choices, if the clinic is reasonably in route between your home and the terminal no travel time is paid. But ALL time at the clinic is compensated.We never got paid for that and the two bit docs that they send us to are pretty far from home for me.
Some of the comments in this thread are a good example of how reluctant people can be to admit that someone they trust is taking advantage of them. It seems the more they have invested, the more they tend to resist the obvious.
The cost of the TSA requirements should be passed on directly to the customer through the Hazardous Material Fee. An hourly employee, with no control over the cost of the Hazmat fee, should not be forced to absorb any of the cost for compliance with government regulations.
Some of the comments in this thread are a good example of how reluctant people can be to admit that someone they trust is taking advantage of them. It seems the more they have invested, the more they tend to resist the obvious.
The cost of the TSA requirements should be passed on directly to the customer through the Hazardous Material Fee. An hourly employee, with no control over the cost of the Hazmat fee, should not be forced to absorb any of the cost for compliance with government regulations.
Amen brother.Some of the comments
in this thread are a good example of
how reluctant people can be to admit
that someone they trust is taking
advantage of them. It seems the more
they have invested, the more they
tend to resist the obvious
The cost of the TSA requirements should be passed on directly to the customer through the Hazardous
Material Fee. An hourly employee,
with no control over the cost of the
Hazmat fee, should not be forced http://www.bizjournals.com/kansasci...jump-up-on-highest-paid-list.html?ana=yahooto absorb any of the cost for compliance
with government regulations.
Some of the comments in this thread are a good example of how reluctant people can be to admit that someone they trust is taking advantage of them. It seems the more they have invested, the more they tend to resist the obvious.
The cost of the TSA requirements should be passed on directly to the customer through the Hazardous Material Fee. An hourly employee, with no control over the cost of the Hazmat fee, should not be forced to absorb any of the cost for compliance with government regulations.
Holland must of erased that article!!At Chicago Heights, YRCF and Roadway before that, time spent for DOT examinations is paid time. Article 51.
I would rather put more in the plus column, the deduction column is already pretty full.The Hazmat fee is a tax deduction if you itemize.
Sure it is.The Hazmat fee is a tax deduction if you itemize.
Should they pass on the cost of you having a CDL to the customer also?? Required by government..Some of the comments in this thread are a good example of how reluctant people can be to admit that someone they trust is taking advantage of them. It seems the more they have invested, the more they tend to resist the obvious.
The cost of the TSA requirements should be passed on directly to the customer through the Hazardous Material Fee. An hourly employee, with no control over the cost of the Hazmat fee, should not be forced to absorb any of the cost for compliance with government regulations.
For combo or P&D, maybe not. For road drivers on laydown bids and sleeper teams, yes it is worth itemizing!Sure it is.
So is work boots, gloves, clothing, and union dues. But you have to reach a certain amount of deductions before it gives you any credit. Same w giving to charities.
Hardly even worth itemiizing for
If they charged a one dollar surcharge for every hazmat shipment they could reimburse every driver and make thousands w the leftover. Kind of the same way they ripped off the customer for the extra fuel surcharge and pocketed the leftoverShould they pass on the cost of you having a CDL to the customer also?? Required by government..
Maybe forward your concern to Welch, and get his thoughts on this issue?If they charged a one dollar surcharge for every hazmat shipment they could reimburse every driver and make thousands w the leftover. Kind of the same way they ripped off the customer for the extra fuel surcharge and pocketed the leftover