If they are able to change this 25% rule, this contract will be the largest bait and switch contract that I can remember. They received a lot of YES votes over this one article. Guys that were on lay-off, near lay-off, and even getting nervous about their position, voted YES, thinking that this was an article that could either protect them, get them back to work, or even get them into a safer position on the board. If this article gets changed now, this would be a slap in the face for everyone that voted yes for this reason. I would not blame anyone for voting yes to try to protect their position. This was a huge article in this contract. If they are allowed to change this article and not be forced to bring you guys back, SHAME ON ALL OF THEM THAT ARE INVOLVED!:toxic:
This was alot of guys points on here. How can you vote YES to something with so many grey areas.
These are things we are hearing about. Wait till we see the coo.