FedEx Freight | No respect.

But they do fire you for laying a back box over, unless you are from such-and-such or know so-and-so, then it's a letter.

They also fire you if you half jokingly tell another employee you're going to whip his ass and someone turns you in. That's OK though, just explain that you where just joking, they'll let you go back to work.

Guardrail

You don't know the half of it....

What you are referring to in commonly known as 'situational ethics'...

Most refer to as BS.

I have been around for awhile...never before have I seen a company so willing to fire someone over little or nothing and then tell another accused of the same infraction to just say 'sorry' and all is good once more.

I don't get it.

Rat
 
i know exactly who they are. The stupidity which is occurring comes from above this level of management! If it wasn't, they would have been fired long ago!! There are to many people running this company that have no clue which end of a truck goes down the road first!! Hey, but if it looks good on "paper" it'll work.. This company hasn't acted like a freight company in years, and its just getting worse. I can't speak for af, but viking did it right, not perfect but right!
yep!...and that's why the merger failed. Because it looked good only on paper. So many customers lost.....
 
yep!...and that's why the merger failed. Because it looked good only on paper. So many customers lost.....

Fire, we all loved Viking or AF, whichever we came from. They were both great companies. They're both gone. The merger hasn't failed. We're turning a profit in an economy wrecked by a socialist who wants to punish you for your hard work. Want this system to work and keep all of us busy making money? Vote republican next election.

End of dissertation.
ST
 
Same here 2 guys 20 yrs plus got into it threating each other I'm not sure if if got physical some say it did some say if didn't buy got a slap on the hand and 3 days off each. WTF.
 
yep!...and that's why the merger failed. Because it looked good only on paper. So many customers lost.....

Please show proof of the failed merger. A profit of $42M in the most recent fiscal quarter (June-August) would indicate otherwise.

oaf (I know I shouldn't feed trolls but it's just so tempting.)
 
yep!...and that's why the merger failed. Because it looked good only on paper. So many customers lost.....

Who are these lost customers names?...

Do you have a list?

I keep hearing about myriads of lost cusomers but I ain't seeing it. At the hub I go to we are busier than hell...during a period that is historically slow.

So...who are these customer we have lost?

Names please???...

Rat
 
Who are these lost customers names?...

Do you have a list?

I keep hearing about myriads of lost cusomers but I ain't seeing it. At the hub I go to we are busier than hell...during a period that is historically slow.

So...who are these customer we have lost?

Names please???...

Rat

Customer turnover is typical. We lose, and gain customers daily. That's part of the business.
 
silent trucker said:
If it's really that terrible a place to work, then why do you stay??? ABF and YRC are still both in business....

ST

I'm just playing both sides here ST..... But it seems here (FXF) there is a wide variety on how rules are enforced. I stand on the same side of the fence as you
but we both have to agree that doing your job here is sometimes not enough to keep your job.
Also helps having some luck ;) lol.
I see the case that's made for " the other side ".
I'm not saying it's a solution

but I do see the point being made. We all see what the issues are we all don't agree on the solution.
I can't blame a guy for feeling he needs protection from the wide variety of enforcement we see on the rules.
 
ABF isnt doing "fine" they are in as muchtrouble as yrc they are just a lot smaller operation that yrc, so their problems are on a much smaller scale. have you been yo a ABF terminal lately, my goodness they are screwed up, with all the union rules and regulations Im here to tell ya its these idiotic rules and regulations that are pissing union customers off. they are not getting their freight on time in some cases its being held on docks for a week or so till yrc or abf decides to deliver it. Im tellin ya fedex better think about every aspect of the union before they start signing cards, and Im tellin ya layoffs will def happen on a much gretaer scale if the union comes in... BEWARE
 
ABF isnt doing "fine" they are in as muchtrouble as yrc they are just a lot smaller operation that yrc, so their problems are on a much smaller scale. have you been yo a ABF terminal lately, my goodness they are screwed up, with all the union rules and regulations Im here to tell ya its these idiotic rules and regulations that are pissing union customers off. they are not getting their freight on time in some cases its being held on docks for a week or so till yrc or abf decides to deliver it. Im tellin ya fedex better think about every aspect of the union before they start signing cards, and Im tellin ya layoffs will def happen on a much gretaer scale if the union comes in... BEWARE
what have you been smokeing
 
ive been smoking the pipe that fedex passes around.. You want a hit? why you must think Im high or something evidently you havent been to a ab or yrc facility lately. and as far as the customers being pissed off I hear it straight from the horses mouth numerou customers who are pissed because the freight is in our town ready for delivery and have been told they will get the freight when they have room to put it on the trailer for delivery.. and I asked a yrc driver if that was true and they told me yeah it was true, so im not just making it up it was told to me by customers and yrc drivers... any more questions muckman1
 
ive been smoking the pipe that fedex passes around.. You want a hit? why you must think Im high or something evidently you havent been to a ab or yrc facility lately. and as far as the customers being pissed off I hear it straight from the horses mouth numerou customers who are pissed because the freight is in our town ready for delivery and have been told they will get the freight when they have room to put it on the trailer for delivery.. and I asked a yrc driver if that was true and they told me yeah it was true, so im not just making it up it was told to me by customers and yrc drivers... any more questions muckman1
no more questions ***** pony
 
I'm just playing both sides here ST..... But it seems here (FXF) there is a wide variety on how rules are enforced. I stand on the same side of the fence as you
but we both have to agree that doing your job here is sometimes not enough to keep your job.
Also helps having some luck ;) lol.
I see the case that's made for " the other side ".
I'm not saying it's a solution

but I do see the point being made. We all see what the issues are we all don't agree on the solution.
I can't blame a guy for feeling he needs protection from the wide variety of enforcement we see on the rules.

Unfortunately, humans are involved, and so rules will be enforced based upon interpretations by individuals...
 
so big deal abf and yrc have freight not getting to thier customers unions dont deliver freight people do union non union it is the people who work while others slack see it everyday
 
no more questions ***** pony

Hey just because you guys lost 120 mil. last quarter and we didn't don't mean ya gotta come over here and stir up some s***.
Ain't our fault you guys are in the dumper right now. You got freight, you just can't make no money on it.
Head back over to your own forum and b**** about Zollars some more or somethin'.
 
Who are these lost customers names?...

Do you have a list?

I keep hearing about myriads of lost cusomers but I ain't seeing it. At the hub I go to we are busier than hell...during a period that is historically slow.

So...who are these customer we have lost?

Names please???...

Rat[/QUOTE WELL LET ME ASK U THIS.....WHY DO THEY HAVE A DOUBLE HUB OPERATION IN MOST CITIES....ATL...DAL...KCY..MEM..HOU.AND SO ON. ISN'T ONE CONSIDERED A "ECONOMY" AND " PRIORITY" HUB? I'M NOT SAYING WE LOST A TON OF CUSTOMERS DUE TO THE MERGER BUT WE'VE LOST QUITE A FEW. BUT IN TURN DUE TO THE MERGER WE'VE GAIN ALOT OF FREIGHT FROM WHAT IS NO LONGER CALLED "NATIONAL LTL". SO I DON'T KNOW IF U RUN INTO A "ECONOMY" OR "PRIORITY" HUB.....BUT THE "ECONOMY" SEEMS TO BE ALWAYS THE BUSIEST OF COURSE.....BUT THEY STILL CLAIM THAT WE HAVE MORE "PRIORITY/NEXT DAY FREIGHT" THAN " ECONOMY" FREIGHT.....I'M JUST SAYING.....
 
WELL LET ME ASK U THIS.....WHY DO THEY HAVE A DOUBLE HUB OPERATION IN MOST CITIES....ATL...DAL...KCY..MEM..HOU.AND SO ON. ISN'T ONE CONSIDERED A "ECONOMY" AND " PRIORITY" HUB? I'M NOT SAYING WE LOST A TON OF CUSTOMERS DUE TO THE MERGER BUT WE'VE LOST QUITE A FEW. BUT IN TURN DUE TO THE MERGER WE'VE GAIN ALOT OF FREIGHT FROM WHAT IS NO LONGER CALLED "NATIONAL LTL". SO I DON'T KNOW IF U RUN INTO A "ECONOMY" OR "PRIORITY" HUB.....BUT THE "ECONOMY" SEEMS TO BE ALWAYS THE BUSIEST OF COURSE.....BUT THEY STILL CLAIM THAT WE HAVE MORE "PRIORITY/NEXT DAY FREIGHT" THAN " ECONOMY" FREIGHT.....I'M JUST SAYING.....

If I've deciphered your SHOUTED answer, you're saying we didn't lose "a ton" of customers, just "quite a few", (and "so many" in your previous post). Yet you don't give any specifics.

You also don't address the fact that in the most recent fiscal quarter, we had operating income of $42 million, compared with an operating loss of $16 million a year ago, nor the fact that our yield (profit per shipment) was up 11%. But the merger was a failure?

Now, because I'm a nice guy, I'm going to help you and confirm at least part of your post: we HAVE lost "some" customers since the merger. Our average daily shipments are down about 7% from last year (85,000 per day versus 92,000) according to our earnings report from a month or so ago.

But when you see fewer daily shipments along with an increased yield, that indicates that a company has willingly walked away from some accounts because they were not profitable (or profitable enough). If both numbers were down, THEN you have an indication that things are not going well (fewer shipments and not making money on the ones we do have). As it is, it's a sign of strength.

Also, if you keep your ear to the ground, you might hear that out of those 85K per day, somewhere around one out of every three are Economy shipments. But that's just channel 4.

Why do we have a "double hub operation in most cities"? You'll have to help me out on what you mean by that, or what relevance it has to anything (although I'm not going to hold my breath). I only know of a couple Economy-only hubs - Mira Loma and North Harrisburg; maybe 10 or so "dual" hubs where they have separate handling cycles; and 4-5 "combo" hubs where the freight is mixed; the rest are Priority only.

So, let's look at the ones you listed: ATL-dual, DAL-dual (FTW is a Priority), KCY-dual, MEM (actually West Memphis)-dual, HOU-Priority. If you're trying to say that the Economy hubs are busier than the Priority hubs, well, there's only a small number of Economy hubs, which means a lot more freight moving through them, as compared to the 40-50 Priority hubs.

oaf (QUIT YELLING)
 
if i've deciphered your shouted answer, you're saying we didn't lose "a ton" of customers, just "quite a few", (and "so many" in your previous post). Yet you don't give any specifics.

You also don't address the fact that in the most recent fiscal quarter, we had operating income of $42 million, compared with an operating loss of $16 million a year ago, nor the fact that our yield (profit per shipment) was up 11%. But the merger was a failure?

Now, because i'm a nice guy, i'm going to help you and confirm at least part of your post: We have lost "some" customers since the merger. Our average daily shipments are down about 7% from last year (85,000 per day versus 92,000) according to our earnings report from a month or so ago.

But when you see fewer daily shipments along with an increased yield, that indicates that a company has willingly walked away from some accounts because they were not profitable (or profitable enough). If both numbers were down, then you have an indication that things are not going well (fewer shipments and not making money on the ones we do have). As it is, it's a sign of strength.

Also, if you keep your ear to the ground, you might hear that out of those 85k per day, somewhere around one out of every three are economy shipments. But that's just channel 4.

Why do we have a "double hub operation in most cities"? You'll have to help me out on what you mean by that, or what relevance it has to anything (although i'm not going to hold my breath). I only know of a couple economy-only hubs - mira loma and north harrisburg; maybe 10 or so "dual" hubs where they have separate handling cycles; and 4-5 "combo" hubs where the freight is mixed; the rest are priority only.

So, let's look at the ones you listed: Atl-dual, dal-dual (ftw is a priority), kcy-dual, mem (actually west memphis)-dual, hou-priority. If you're trying to say that the economy hubs are busier than the priority hubs, well, there's only a small number of economy hubs, which means a lot more freight moving through them, as compared to the 40-50 priority hubs.

Oaf (quit yelling)
welp, not to offend u sir because my words are typed in the upper case character size....i apologize. That's not a case of me yelling. That's just how the cpu is set. But i never proclaimed that i knew the actual numbers or stats. But i will take into consideration of the stats & numbers that you posted in your reply. Thank u.
 
No offense taken, by any stretch. Just trying to figure out your logic for the "failed" merger.

oaf
 
Top