My point is that you guys are sitting here speculating what the union will get for you. Maybe you should have known what they were going to negotiate before you signed on with them. (Car analogy again). That'd be like signing for a car loan without first knowing the terms.
As for the 401k matching, union employees at UPS do not get the matching 50% up to 7%. Only non-union, so when you go union, you can kiss that good-bye. And the ONLY thing the teamsters want from you is to manage your pension and health benefits. What else is in it for them?
As for what we do, I will do like everyone else and I'll go along with the 50% plus one. I'm just wish people would think before they jump and know what they're giving up before they ever know what the union is going to get them.
First of all the contract itself at this point is a basic contract for us other than Indy,I am sure Indy has already (I assume) worked on it's suppliments for central states, and is negotiating currently of coarse.
The contract when ratified by the company, must be presented too those who wanted the teamster's to begin with and then they ( people in INDY) say yeah or nay, thus ratifying thier contract.
So even though we speculate, and most of us on this site does just that. The ideas floating around from this speculation could infact be used when other region's vote for thier suppliments. Not a bad thing.
But for someone who has not been involved in the transitioning of the union into a new co. Your car analogy holds no water in this matter.
If we were too implement your car analogy, we would be here for years just trying too figure out what people want on paper,( rather clumsy and time consuming srtategy) . I have 30 more years to go and probably would not see a contract until I retire.
If the 50 - 7% ratio disappears, but after 30 years I gain 55% more in my pention what Have I lost?
The implementation of a 401 K is nothing more then fluidity in the market, and in result over 30 years could infact be less then a 55% gain in my pention. And furthermore ,correct me if I am wrong brownies, brownies do get the 401K through UPS but do not get the stock match.
Besides, as for speculation, lets say they keep our retirement the way it is and they do not throw away 50-7, what would you say then? We will certainly retire with less in pention then we could have. but gain a match in a 401K with a match, you are not comparing apples to apples in your car analogy. We ( the contract) is simply shifting monies from one benifit too another, I fail too see where we will be losing anything here.
As far as managing the health and welfare, do you realize what UPS will save in ADMINISTRATIVE COST'S if they move HR to the Teamster's, particularly if we are paying for this. It is and I am sure being ignorent too ups figures of coarse,
(QUITE A BIG CHUNK OF CHANGE)
As a matter of fact in an interview with Mike E last year he said and I quote " We are currently working too diminish redundancy in our trucking and supply chain solution divisions, which inturn is directly related to thier losses, which also include ADMINISTARTIVE COSTS ' . If the teamster's take over health and welfare, UPS has victory in cutting some of it's ADMINISTRATIVE COST'S.
Speculate all we want, shame on us. ( but I can see where your car analogy can be put too good use here).
No offence of coarse just reality.