You've said you don't care about the cameras, and believe union members should look out for each other. Yet you believe that somehow, a Teamster using company supplied technology to help a fellow Teamster understand said technology (and how to avoid it) isn't a brother looking out for a brother, based solely upon the fact that the union did not supply the technology?
I understand your view on the corporate hierarchy. You're not wrong. The corporate view on safety vs. costs is how things like the Bhopal disaster happen. Technology like these cameras are there for us in accidents. Don't believe in the company-supplied Lytx ones? Get one of your own from a truck stop, because the footage can prove your innocence if a four wheeler cuts it too close.
If there's a fatal accident that you are involved in, your brother can't be called to testify against you because there's nothing for him to say that has anything to do with the incident, and any good lawyer would point that out if someone tried it. You would not be coached on the footage of a fatality, as that footage becomes evidence supplied to the court by Lytx on the company's behalf. And the company sure doesn't want such an accident to be your fault because, regardless of whether or not they care about YOU, they do not want one of their employees to be found responsible for a fatality because THEY are held accountable for it if you are. It's THEIR ASS if it's YOUR FAULT. So you can at least assume in this case that the company isn't going to throw you under the bus because it means they lose too.
As for the camera itself, no truck driver wants a company-run camera in their truck for fear of possible retribution. However, a lot of that has more to do with the inward facing camera than the outward one because nobody ever wants to incriminate themselves. I disagree with the inward camera, but the outward one can do a lot of good.
Show of hands. If the union had put it to vote, how many would've actually been in favor of having cameras installed?