I have been confused about many things I
read on these boards since UPS purchased
Overnite and started UPSF . Possibly the
more enlightened could educate myself and
others on some specifics here .
#1 Why have the UPS package teamster members NOT tried or attmpted to expand
their membership and numbers to take in the UPSF employees ?
#2 Now that it appears that UPSF INDY has
a contract , why are those people doing
the same as above ?
#3 If in fact , UPSF INDY has a contract ,
why is it not available in full to read ?
#4 Are there vows of secracy about these
things ?
#5 Are rumors and part or untrueths the
preferred instead of facts ?
Thank You
To awnser some of your questionds to the best of my knowledge, some I have proof, some I do not but here it goes. For those of you who want the proof, GO FIND IT. And feel free to correct me if I am wrong.
#1 . Too awnser your first question, UPS Teamsters did and have and still do approach everyone on the issues of the union and UPS. Acard check was put into play, INDIANAPOLIS won the first card check, and then a contract was negotiated.
From what some of us understand, UPS allowed the card check as a bargaining chip, in referrance to allowing UPS too come out of the Central States Pention Fund. And "I think" (I have not seen) the three year cardcheck was in the most recently negotiated contract for UPS Freight, for 2008.( GOLFCART CONSPIRACY)
#2. As I have mentioned there is a 3 year contract into play , starting next week. Some terminals had card check's a year ago, but nothing could be done with further card checks until after ratification of the new UPS contract of 2008. Which is now done.
#3. The contract for INDY is a legal and binding contract, this is not our contract just INDY'S. So therefore we ( the rest of the terminals) cannot actually see this contract unless we as employees have sighned cards to do so. (The Teamsters have an obligation to treat this contract in a legal manner and by law cannot reveal if asked by either party not to do so) So therefore, legally they are binded to only allow those interested in the union, within the company to see the contract by sighning a card. but considering the two parties involved are allowing this contract to reveal itself, some of the contract that can be revealed is, and could be in referrance to us, as opposed to what was not revealed, which in all cases is significant too Indionaplois.
# 4. The awnser to this question is in Paragraph #3.
#5. NON TRUTHS, and RUMORS are not preferred, too most, the credibility of some of the info. we debate on these forums is based mostly, but not solely, on a rough draft that we have obtained over the past 6-7 months or so.
I hope some of these explanations has awnsered any questions you may have and if anyone can correct or add please do.:smilie_132: