Yep, It does "SEEM" that way. But, things are not always what they seem. I know very little, and even less that would be suitable for sharing, hence the repeated phrase: "We stay tuned..."
Since we're supposed to be talking about insurance, How much was it that we lost? Lost in the reduction of value in the insurance benefit? 5, 6, 8 grand per year? If it was just $5200/year in lost value, that would equate to $100/week ($2.50/hour). But that's not a big deal. Certainly not worth getting concerned about, right?
And if you happen to be lucky enough to work out of a location with a wage falling way behind the competition, by $1-$2/hour (3-4 cents/mile), then you should just be happy to know that you have contributed even more to the bottom line, than most., right?
Combine those two above figures, and you might have a little bit of reason for concern, right? Or am I missing something?
How much (less) should be accepted, before one says, enough already? Who might one speak to, to make the case for better? Who might provide a reasonable explanation and to why it's not better?
Just questions...